If you ever thought that building homes using 3D printing method is a futuristic thought, you are wrong. The real work is slowly becoming popular. One startup that is using this method is haus.me. This tech startup recently started a new collection firm in Reno, Nevada. It intends to ship its first prints to customers in Arizona California and Nevada.
Structures by haus.me feature smart home technologies,3D printing, and zero-carbon discharge. They also feature the ability to operate without electricity using their own power, septic systems, and water.
According to reports, haus-me homes are not certainly a bargain. This is because the grid-connected base model costs $200,000. However, homes can be tailored for off the grid serviceability.
Apart from the attractive sustainability attributes, the houses may be made in four to seven weeks. This is based on company reports. They are different from conventional onsite house construction utilising regular materials that might take several months to finish.
While this practice is budding, other firms are accelerating the 3D printed housing market. In 2018, ICON claimed to have built the first allowed 3D printed house. This location was said to be in Austin, Texas, United States. After that, the firm has unveiled its Vulcan II printer. The printer can build houses that measure up to 2,000sq.ft. in size.
Another company in this business is of 3D printing, its Apis Cor. The company plans to construct an exhibit house in the United States in 2020.
Apart from that, some companies in the Netherlands are making big moves. A group of companies has established a factory using 3D machines that utilize concrete. The companies intend to provide supplies for the five houses to be constructed for the Project Milestone in Eindhoven City.
Advantages and disadvantages of 3D printed homes
Use of 3D printing methods for construction homes has its bright side. Lower costs may be achieved than with conventional methods. This is due to a decrease in raw materials and labor expenditure. Also, the use of this method for construction is less extravagant. A 3D project produces 30 per cent of the waste a traditional project generates. This report is based on Industry estimates.
Additionally, using 3D printing lessens the time it takes to construct, approximately six weeks against six months required for a normal new house. 3D printing give room for more affordable and creative design shapes. This may be a desirable feature for homeowners and architects seeking a distinctive style.
Nevertheless, there are difficulties stalling the adoption of 3D printing houses. Lack of building codes and regulations that define the standards is one of them. This hurdle can be managed. However, it’s time-consuming for regulators to be accustomed to the methods and compose the right rules.
Also, there is a current limit on the kinds of materials that may be used. Currently, the procedure is restricted hugely to concrete and plastics. Homes that need steel or wood still have to use conventional products.